Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
King Charles gifts Trump treasured item with serendipitous name at state dinner before making room …
Security environment portrayed as vulnerable despite downplaying threats
portrayed as effective in preventing attack despite omission of near-miss risks
Security threats downplayed through omission, creating illusion of safety
Secret Service is depicted as trustworthy and deserving of the highest respect
Secret Service is portrayed as highly effective and heroic in protecting the first family
Secret Service is indirectly framed as effective despite missing shots, reinforcing institutional competence
The Secret Service is implicitly framed as failing to protect the president at large public events, necessitating a new secure venue.
The Secret Service is portrayed as highly effective in neutralizing a threat
Secret Service competence implicitly questioned through comparison to past failures
Implies Secret Service effectiveness by noting agent survived due to protective gear
Framed as effective and decisive
Secret Service portrayed as effective and successful in neutralizing threat
Secret Service portrayed as ineffective due to missed shots
Secret Service portrayed as effective despite missing shots
Implied failure of protective institutions due to cultural hostility
Secret Service response is portrayed as potentially reckless and uncontrolled
Secret Service framed as misusing authority by investigating trivial symbolic content
Secret Service portrayed as responding to a credible symbolic threat
Implies ongoing vulnerability of presidential security
Framed as under threat from politically motivated violence
Secret Service portrayed as under threat
Secret Service portrayed as credible and heroic despite ongoing investigation
Secret Service portrayed as overwhelmed or failing to prevent repeated security breaches
Witnesses recount chaos at WHCA Dinner after shooting, Secret Service agents drew guns to evacuate …
Secret Service portrayed as reactive but competent in crisis
Secret Service portrayed as competent and heroic in thwarting attack
Implied lack of trust in US security institutions to protect foreign dignitaries
Security situation framed as fragile and under threat despite official assurances
Portraying elections as under threat despite lack of evidence
Framed as potentially failing in coordination during a critical incident
Framed as potentially responsible for internal error (friendly fire) without accountability
National security portrayed as endangered by poor vetting
Parliamentary security is portrayed as failing due to systemic incompetence and poor spending priorities
security vetting process portrayed as compromised by political timelines
Secret Service portrayed as failing in equitable protection during crisis
Vetting process portrayed as compromised by political pressure
slightly questioned on effectiveness due to evacuation sequence
Secret Service is framed as incompetent due to security oversights
Hospital security protocols implicitly framed as ineffective despite stated compliance
Security apparatus implied as failing despite successful interception
Security guards are portrayed as heroic defenders of public order against criminal threats
Security is portrayed as compromised and vulnerable
Implied failure of security despite evidence of effective response
Secret Service portrayed as systematically incompetent and failing in core protective duties
Portrayed as vulnerable and insufficient despite official reassurances
Secret Service framed as institutionally inadequate and under-resourced
Secret Service portrayed as failing to ensure safety
Security situation portrayed as under severe and immediate threat
security vetting process depicted as overruled and disregarded
Security around the president framed as dangerously lax and compromised
The Secret Service is framed as constrained and ineffective due to systemic limitations
portrayed as compromised and inadequate
Secret Service portrayed as failing in security performance
Implies the Secret Service failed to prevent a serious breach despite Trump's praise
Secret Service framed as effective despite attack
Security guards framed as vulnerable and at risk of harm and job loss
Union portrayed as responsible and credible advocate for worker safety
Secret Service portrayed as highly effective in crisis response
Secret Service is portrayed as highly effective in response
Implied questions about Secret Service trustworthiness due to security lapses
Secret Service portrayed as effective despite scrutiny
Security checkpoint portrayed as compromised and vulnerable
Secret Service response framed as largely effective despite lapses
Minute-by-minute break down of how Washington's most glamorous gala descended into night of calamity
Secret Service portrayed as highly effective in neutralizing threat and protecting the President
Secret Service portrayed as effective and competent in response
Secret Service is portrayed as failing in its protective duties
Secret Service portrayed as failing in proactive security measures
Secret Service leadership questioned for retaining officials linked to prior failures
Secret Service portrayed as failing in proactive security measures
Trump's many upcoming large, public events may present fresh security challenges after latest attack
portrayed as under scrutiny for potential lapses in planning
Implied failure in security protocols at a high-profile event, though not explicitly stated.
The suspect is portrayed as a serious and imminent threat to public safety, especially targeting political figures.
Hilton venue portrayed as vulnerable and inadequate
Security response framed as inadequate despite official success in stopping suspect
Security apparatus portrayed as vulnerable and underprepared
Security at the event is portrayed as compromised and vulnerable
Secret Service performance is implicitly questioned due to breach, though not directly criticized
Security at the event is portrayed as compromised and under immediate threat
Implied failure of protective security measures
Secret Service portrayed as effective despite clear security failures
Secret Service portrayed as highly effective and brave, deflecting scrutiny over security lapses
Security checkpoints framed as vulnerable and ineffective
Secret Service portrayed as highly effective and swift
Security is portrayed as critically compromised and vulnerable
Secret Service portrayed as failing in protective duty
implied to be failing in protective duties due to incident occurrence and chaotic response
Secret Service portrayed as incompetent and unprepared
Secret Service portrayed as effective despite security breach
Security performance questioned due to breach
Security at high-profile political events portrayed as compromised and vulnerable
Secret Service response framed as highly effective and successful
Secret Service portrayed as failing in core protective function
Secret Service portrayed as effective despite close breach
Security protocols implicitly questioned despite agent success
Portrayed as incompetent and incapable of basic protection duties
Security response framed as reactive and overwhelmed
Implied failure in protecting high-level officials at secure event
Secret Service competence questioned due to breach
Security response implied as reactive rather than preventive
Secret Service portrayed as reactive rather than preventative
Secret Service portrayed as highly effective and swift