Sam Altman
Date Range
Score Range
Sky News (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Elon Musk says Sam Altman tried to 'steal' charity, as moguls contest $150bn court battle
framed as dishonest and attempting to betray a charitable mission
The article uses charged language like 'steal' in quotes and emphasizes Musk's accusation that Altman broke promises about OpenAI's nonprofit status, framing him as untrustworthy without immediate counterbalance.
“Elon Musk has accused his rival Sam Altman of trying to 'steal' a charity”
New York Post (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Elon Musk testifies he was a ‘fool’ to invest with ‘disingenuous’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman …
Sam Altman is portrayed as untrustworthy and misleading
[loaded_language]: The use of 'disingenuous' to describe Altman’s reassurances directly frames him as dishonest. The narrative centers Musk’s betrayal, reinforcing Altman’s negative portrayal.
“He ripped Altman over what he called “disingenuous” reassurances that OpenAI would remain a nonprofit.”
BBC News (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Fresh wave of lawsuits filed against OpenAI by Tumbler Ridge victims
Sam Altman is framed as personally accountable for a failure of ethical leadership
[editorializing], [proper_attribution]
“I am deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement," Altman wrote in an open letter published by local news outlet Tumbler RidgeLines.”
Reuters (Ally / Adversary) : Families of Canadian mass shooting victims sue OpenAI, CEO Altman in US court
Altman is framed as an adversarial figure who prioritized profit over public safety
[editorializing] Quoting attorney’s claim that OpenAI’s actions were 'pretty close to the definition of evil' without critical framing; [framing_by_emphasis] Repeated focus on leadership overruling safety team
“But Altman and other OpenAI leadership overruled the safety team and police were never called, the lawsuit alleges.”
The Globe and Mail (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Families of Tumbler Ridge shooting victims sue OpenAI, CEO Altman in U.S. court
Altman is framed as personally responsible for overriding safety protocols, damaging his integrity
[framing_by_emphasis], [vague_attribution]
“But Altman and other OpenAI leadership overruled the safety team and police were never called, the lawsuit alleges.”
The New York Times (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : OpenAI Trial Starts With Two Very Different Tales of a Company’s Early Years
Sam Altman is framed as driven by greed and responsible for betraying OpenAI's nonprofit roots
[loaded_language] and [framing_by_emphasis]: The phrase 'greatest heists in history' and 'stealing a charity' are directly tied to Altman’s actions, implying moral corruption.
“In Mr. Musk’s telling, OpenAI’s shift was one of the greatest heists in history — a nonprofit ripped from its promise of altruism by the greed of Mr. Altman, who founded OpenAI with Mr. Musk and a group of A.I. researchers more than 10 years ago.”
Stuff.co.nz (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Elon Musk takes stand in trial vs. Sam Altman that could reshape AI's future
framed as untrustworthy and driven by profit over principle
[loaded_language], [narrative_framing]
““we are here because Mr. Musk didn’t get his way with OpenAI.””
news.com.au (Ally / Adversary) : ‘Scam Altman’: Elon Musk accusations open blockbuster AI trial
Subject framed as a hostile actor working against the public good
narrative_framing, loaded_language
“Mr Musk argues in his lawsuit that Mr Altman drove OpenAI to become an industry juggernaut seeking to dethrone the likes of Google, Apple and Microsoft as a big tech profit maker, betraying its non-profit mission.”
The New York Times (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Elon Musk Takes OpenAI to Court
Altman framed as potentially corrupt for prioritizing commercial interests
[cherry_picking] highlights Musk's accusation that Altman 'put commercial interests over the public good' without counterbalancing with OpenAI's stated mission or governance reforms
“Musk is accusing Altman of tricking him into handing over money to start OpenAI as a nonprofit, only for Altman and his allies to later put commercial interests over the public good.”
The Globe and Mail (Trustworthy / Corrupt) : Elon Musk and Sam Altman arrive in court for trial that could reshape AI’s future
Sam Altman is framed as untrustworthy, having betrayed OpenAI’s founding mission for personal and corporate gain
Loaded language and editorializing in describing the testimony as a 'tale chock full of alleged betrayal, deceit and ambition' directly frames Altman negatively, aligning with Musk’s narrative.
“testimony will begin with Musk’s side presenting a tale chock full of alleged betrayal, deceit and ambition that caused OpenAI to pivot from its founding mission as an altruistic startup to a capitalistic venture now valued at US$852-billion.”