Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
Military spending framed as harmful due to high cost and lack of oversight
Public investment in sports via sovereign funds is framed as potentially serving political over public benefit
Public spending on military action framed as wasteful and poorly justified
Tiffany Henyard was reportedly living in Georgia while still serving as Dolton mayor, collecting pay
Public spending framed as being misused for personal luxury
Public spending framed as inefficient and poorly managed
NASA budget cuts framed as damaging to science and education pipelines
Taxpayer-funded projects framed as wasteful and self-aggrandizing
Implying current funding levels are harmful to student outcomes despite government claims of increases
Use of public funds framed as wasteful given poor program outcomes
Government subsidies framed as necessary and beneficial economic protection for vulnerable sectors
Public spending is framed as potentially misused, with emphasis on avoiding taxpayer funding while downplaying alternative public financing mechanisms.
public funds mismanaged due to institutional incompetence
Public investment framed as being at risk due to mismanagement and cost overruns
Public investment in the hospital is framed as wasteful and damaging to fiscal responsibility
Framed as wasteful and mismanaged use of public funds
framing suggests exclusion of public interest in favor of presidential glorification
framing use of public funds as wasteful and improperly managed
Public spending is framed as wasteful and poorly accountable
Public finances framed as under strain due to deficits
Public institutions framed as vulnerable to scandal with economic fallout
State funding system framed as failing to support schools
framed as government defence spending being leveraged effectively for industrial policy
Public funds framed as being wasted on militarism rather than民生 needs
The jet purchase is framed as a harmful misuse of public funds
Framing public spending on Indigenous services as beneficial for economic and social development
Technology procurement in schools framed as lacking oversight and accountability
Smoking is framed as harmful to public finances and health infrastructure
Current funding model for RTÉ is framed as failing due to reliance on licence fee and commercial pressures
public spending framed as illegitimate due to elite capture
Public spending is framed as potentially beneficial if delivering value, rather than inherently wasteful
Existing state regulation framed as ineffective due to poor enforcement
Public spending framed as wasteful due to unresolved project disputes
government spending decisions framed as harmful to public information infrastructure
public spending portrayed as wasteful and mismanaged
Government spending on hospital acquisition implied as legitimate but lacking transparency
Public spending on executive pay framed as excessive and lacking accountability
Public spending framed as strategically effective through asset optimization
public spending framed as potentially wasteful without clear economic return
Framing public spending as being in crisis due to debt and inefficiency
Implying past asset sales were poorly executed and damaged public trust
Portraying state assets as vulnerable to poor management or financial pressure
Government spending on war framed as harmful to domestic welfare
frames massive defense spending as necessary and effective
federal spending policy framed as harmful to regional equity
Private funding of public infrastructure framed as clearly beneficial
Framing the withdrawal as a rational, phased reallocation of public resources
Government and Irish Rail portrayed as failing to deliver adequate public transport investment
Financial policies during emergency framed as harmful to vulnerable evacuees
Government fiscal policy is framed as actively harmful to citizens by increasing fuel duty amid crisis
Public spending portrayed as prone to corruption and misuse
framed as wasteful and damaging due to cost overruns and poor outcomes
Public funds are portrayed as being at risk due to lack of oversight
Public spending is portrayed as poorly managed due to systemic failures in cost recovery
Frames $400 million ballroom as a justified security investment rather than fiscal excess
Government spending framed as ineffective and unsustainable
Public spending on migrant accommodation is framed as wasteful and enabling criminality
Frames the ballroom project as wasteful and harmful public expenditure
Frames the ballroom project as wasteful and inappropriate use of public resources
Public funds for ballroom framed as potentially corrupt or misused
framed as causing harm to vulnerable individuals
Public spending on adult social care framed as insufficient and misaligned with need
frames proposed budget cuts as harmful to national scientific investment
Public spending is depicted as mismanaged and contributing to economic decline
Government spending is portrayed as harmful and inflationary rather than stabilizing or investment-oriented
Public spending is framed as potentially irresponsible and politically driven
Implying government intervention is necessary and effective for economic resilience
Framing public investment as an urgent response to external threat
Government spending framed as inherently harmful and extravagant
council's management of public assets framed as harmful rather than beneficial
Portrays public investment as a competent strategy for economic resilience
Current defence spending levels framed as insufficient for strategic demands
The disparity in childcare funding between Wales and England is framed as an unjustifiable inequity
Public investment in defence infrastructure is framed as inadequate and slipping, creating a crisis in delivery timelines
Public investment framed as beneficial and necessary for national resilience
Framed as highly beneficial and essential for economic growth and resilience
Framing public investment in defence infrastructure as inadequate and inconsistent
Government investment pipeline portrayed as faltering
Government spending portrayed as effective and targeted
Portrays public investment as effective and strategically necessary
Use of taxpayer money on parliamentary bars framed as wasteful and unjustified
Litigation crisis threatening economic stability and corporate liability
framed with suspicion over transparency and justification of funds
Government fiscal claims framed as untrustworthy due to contradictory data
Portrays the program as a failure in execution and value delivery
Frames public spending on PrescribeIT as wasteful and ineffective
Frames public expenditure on the ballroom as illegitimate due to lack of congressional approval
Suggests financial inefficiency in refugee accommodation spending
Public spending is framed as mismanaged and disproportionately benefiting non-citizens
Public spending is framed as endangered by risky fiscal choices
Construction of a new White House ballroom is implicitly framed as a necessary and beneficial investment
Portraying current federal spending programs as illegitimate and in need of wholesale re-evaluation
Federal student aid spending under Biden framed as wasteful and harmful to taxpayers
Framing increased defence spending as effective and purposeful investment in national and European security
Trump's proposed $2506m ballroom is framed as a wasteful and unjustified expenditure
Public spending initiative is framed with questions about fiscal responsibility and transparency
Public spending is framed as a necessary and effective response to economic challenges
council financial management framed as failing, leading to prolonged dispute
Public spending initiatives framed as economically destructive rather than socially beneficial
Underfunding and understaffing framed as directly harmful to public safety
framed as under severe fiscal pressure requiring difficult choices