Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
Military action in Iran framed as illegitimate due to lack of congressional approval and transparency
military leadership changes framed as abnormal and poorly justified
Military action in Ukraine framed as subject to personal diplomacy, undermining legal and institutional legitimacy
Military action framed as an urgent, existential crisis requiring escalation
US military actions implicitly framed as illegitimate due to omission of war context
Military action framed as illegitimate due to omission of international law violations
Military action portrayed as endangering US and regional stability
National security is framed as under potential threat due to legislative lapse
Maritime aid operations framed as occurring in a state of crisis and insecurity
Iranian population and state portrayed as under severe threat from US-led military action
Military cooperation framed as mutually beneficial and historically vital
Military escalation framed as a beneficial tool of negotiation
Naval tensions framed as an urgent and escalating crisis
Iranian-linked military actions framed as illegitimate and covert
Military action framed as economically and geopolitically harmful
Military action implicitly justified as necessary and effective
Military action framed as urgent and escalating
US military portrayed as vulnerable due to munitions shortages
U.S. military action in Iran framed as justified and lawful despite international legal concerns
Russian military action portrayed as failing due to vulnerability and lack of progress
Military escalation normalised as necessary response
Previous attack linked to Islamic State, framing extremist violence as ongoing geopolitical threat
Ukrainian military strikes framed as strategically beneficial to war effort
U.S. military interventions portrayed as illegitimate and imperialistic
Foreign recruits portrayed as systematically endangered by Russian military deployment practices
The ongoing wars are acknowledged but underemphasized, framing them as background rather than crisis
US and Israeli military action framed as illegitimate and unlawful
UAE's regional military involvement framed as illegitimate and linked to atrocities
Military action in Iran framed as destabilizing and causally linked to economic crisis, implying illegitimacy
National security situation framed as being in crisis due to suspected foreign targeting of scientists
Framed as legally questionable but not challenged
U.S. military posture framed as strained and vulnerable
Military operations framed as unstable and escalating
US military action framed as lacking legitimacy due to omission of international law violations
Iran war portrayed as requiring urgent alignment, implying regional instability threatens NZ interests
U.S. military position framed as under threat and depleted
Framed as operating in a high-threat, urgent environment requiring AI integration
Civilians in Gaza portrayed as under persistent threat from Israeli military operations
Terrorism linked to extremist ideology without distinguishing isolated actors from state or group legitimacy
military operations framed as strained or compromised
Military action in Iran framed as illegitimate due to lack of authorization and war crimes
U.S. military action framed as illegitimate due to omission of strategic rationale and emphasis on political controversy
The military conflict is framed as an urgent, existential crisis requiring unwavering support
Military action framed as destructive and unjustified
framed as illegitimate due to lack of congressional approval and alignment with Trump's unilateral approach
Russian military presence portrayed as under threat, justifying defensive measures
U.S.-Israeli military strikes implicitly normalized as legitimate
military display framed as endangered by drone attacks
Military situation framed as escalating and unstable, forcing symbolic retreat in parade planning
RAF flights used by Andrew framed as potentially illegitimate use of state resources for personal benefit
framed as an urgent, escalating crisis requiring immediate response
The maritime domain is framed as being in urgent crisis requiring immediate military transformation
U.S. military action framed as aggressive and unilateral
Military action in Ukraine framed as an ongoing crisis destabilizing Russia’s symbolic institutions
military force framed as harmful and damaging to civilians
Military confrontation framed as an urgent, escalating crisis requiring decisive action
Military action is portrayed as causing severe civilian harm and strategic overreach
frames military action as endangering U.S. troops due to unpreparedness
Military alliances framed as under urgent threat
US military posture framed as vulnerable and overstretched
Military action framed as hostile and aggressive toward Iran
Ceasefire and broader situation framed as unstable and in crisis
Historical and ongoing foreign resource extraction framed as harmful exploitation
Israeli military operations framed as causing disproportionate civilian harm
Military action framed as harmful to domestic economic stability
framed as a battlefield environment where soldiers face extreme danger and psychological pressure
framed as an escalating, high-intensity conflict with extreme measures
Frames the shooting as part of an ongoing pattern of political violence
US military strikes on Iran framed as justified and lawful
US military and economic actions framed as legitimate policy tools
The US and its allies framed as under threat from Iran, ignoring reciprocal aggression
Situation in the Taiwan Strait framed as escalating toward crisis, with high risk of conflict
Military action in the Gulf framed as illegitimate due to omission of war crimes and lack of authorization
Use of Russian mercenaries implicitly framed as illegitimate security solution
Reframes historical British military aggression (Burning of Washington) as a lighthearted joke
Regional security framed as deteriorating, with coalition breakdowns
Military Action framed in extreme crisis mode due to Strait of Hormuz blockade and war escalation
Military engagement in Middle East framed as necessary and urgent
The ceremonial event is portrayed as secure, dignified, and under full control
Military history framed as positive, unifying legacy
The archaeological site and cultural artefacts are framed as under direct military threat
Security justification for the ballroom framed as illegitimate and pretextual
Military action framed as illegitimate due to strategic failure and escalation risk
Wartime maritime danger downplayed by normalizing elite vessel passage
Framing domestic security threats as adversarial incursions requiring military-grade response
Military institutions are portrayed as endangering civilians rather than protecting them
Military tensions framed as accelerating toward inevitable crisis
Framed as entering a state of acute global nuclear crisis
Diplomatic processes framed as high-drama 'blockbuster' events rather than routine governance
US military portrayed as overextended and at risk
Military action in Iran framed as illegitimate and unchecked
Iran's military actions framed as illegitimate and aggressive
Military alliance and spending framed as necessary and positive
UK military actions framed as beneficial and vital to shared security
Military conflict framed as ongoing, urgent crisis requiring escalation
Military action framed as escalating and causing ongoing crisis in civilian areas
Military action in Khartoum is framed as leaving behind illegitimate and enduring civilian hazards
US/Israeli military action against Iran framed as legally and morally questionable by omission of war crime context
Implying lack of accountability in military conduct during urban warfare
Conflict framed as ongoing crisis with no diplomatic resolution in sight