Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
framed as aligned with partisan media interests
portrayed as misused and contrary to race-neutral principles
Media reporting is portrayed as somewhat inconsistent, but transparent about sourcing
Media coverage is framed as biased or corrupt in favor of Arsenal
Media portrayed as under political threat due to comedic speech
Media (TVNZ) framed as untrustworthy through legal intimidation and suppression of reporting
Voting Rights Act framed as being systematically undermined
Social media is framed as a dangerous tool enabling threats and division
Social media and digital identity framed as tools for deception and erasure in criminal behavior
Survivors of abuse and critical voices are excluded from the narrative
News media is portrayed as prioritizing entertainment over substantive reporting
The media's role in amplifying unproven allegations is implied as ethically questionable
Suggesting instability and unreliability in high-profile media production
Framed as biased and irresponsible in political discourse
Media practices framed as sensationalist and illegitimate
Media framing is portrayed as irresponsible and biased, favoring sensationalism over factual reporting
The media industry is depicted as under siege and collapsing due to AI
Upholding women's rights in sport is framed as a legitimate and essential duty of international institutions
Framing special needs students as systematically excluded from full educational participation
Media inclusion of public emotional engagement in animal rescue
framed as a partisan ally rather than neutral institution
Comedians are framed as marginalized and excluded by progressive norms
Framed as morally compromised and susceptible to political pressure
survivors framed as excluded and silenced by institutional power
Media portrayed as corrupt and politically compromised
Consent discussion lacks legal grounding, subtly questioning legitimacy of victim's claim
Social media framed as a dangerous force exposing inappropriate conduct
Human rights protections framed as failing to prevent state-enabled exploitation of vulnerable individuals
media institution depicted as harming national cultural economic potential
Social media framed as causing significant psychological harm to youth
Media outlet portrayed as ethically compromised due to personal conduct of reporter
Media leadership is failing in crisis management
Media coverage is implicitly framed as driven by anonymous leaks and rumor, undermining credibility
Voting Rights Act framed as being actively destroyed, with harmful consequences for democracy
Media's role at the gala framed as ethically compromised
Framed as corrupt, self-serving, and violating journalistic ethics during a crisis
Suggests media prioritizes sensationalism over responsible reporting
Media portrayed as biased and untrustworthy in its portrayal of landlords
Framed as being unfairly targeted and excluded by government pressure
Framed as vulnerable to political manipulation
Framed as being targeted and excluded from protection
Media portrayed as under unjust attack but standing firm
frames the story as a media spectacle and ongoing crisis
Media freedom portrayed as under threat from government
Media portrayed as unfairly targeted and morally justified in its criticism
Framed as promoting unserious, sensationalist coverage over factual reporting
Media event portrayed as plunged into crisis, emphasizing disruption of 'glitziest' gathering
Media portrayed as irresponsible and morally compromised
Workplace grievance system framed as inaccessible and ineffective
Human rights, especially for marginalized communities, portrayed as under threat
media commentary portrayed as harmful satire rather than constructive analysis
The incident is framed as a crisis-worthy scandal through social media escalation
Framed as favoring inauthentic voices over legitimate conservative representation
sensational media production framed as legitimate investigative inquiry
Social media is framed as a platform for public shaming and conflict escalation
Media is portrayed as complicit in amplifying celebrity conflict over substance
Human rights principles framed as being undermined and excluded
Media coverage is implicitly framed as selective and politically charged
Religious liberty framed as a legitimate and violated right
Portrayed as amplifying gendered scrutiny and public skepticism rather than reporting neutrally on personal decisions
Mainstream media implied to be ideologically biased in celebrity coverage
Epstein survivors framed as excluded and ignored by leadership
Military actions framed as causing severe civilian harm
Framed as adversarial to child protection efforts
Framed as a source of danger to children
Media institutions portrayed as failing by prioritizing controversy over substance
Media figures portrayed as self-aggrandizing and untrustworthy
Framed as a source of political illegitimacy when used by candidates
The state dinner is framed as a backdrop for personal drama rather than a stable diplomatic occasion
media framing undermines journalistic legitimacy by prioritising polls and drama over factual reporting
framed as amplifying speculation over facts
Implies media community is under suspicion or complicit in conspiracies
Framing Indigenous women and girls as under threat due to insufficient government action
Media portrayed as credible and insightful interpreters of cultural significance
Framed as prioritizing sensationalism and emotional manipulation over responsible reporting
Media event framed as emotionally charged and destabilizing
Media framing questioned due to speculative and unverified interpretations
Media/social media portrayed as affirming elite cultural standards
Positioning conservative media projects as legitimate moral correctives to mainstream culture
Undermining media objectivity by relying on vague public reactions and fan sentiment
Implies media sensationalism undermines legitimate public interest in criminal rehabilitation stories
Media outlets reporting on Gaza famine are portrayed as untrustworthy and part of a propaganda effort
Media portrayed as untrustworthy due to selective editing
Media institution portrayed as dishonest and untrustworthy
Media institutions (BBC) framed as dishonest and opaque in their public communications
Social media is portrayed as a manipulated and unsafe space for authentic cultural engagement
framed as an accelerant of radicalization and political violence
Implying media sensationalism around individual achievements
sports media portrayed as complicit in moralizing athlete bodies
Mainstream media and its audience ('NPR donor class') are portrayed as ideologically biased and gullible
Undermining media credibility by positioning the outlet as a paparazzi-style observer
Framed as amplifying a crisis of misinformation in beauty discourse
The media, specifically the show's producers and hosts, are framed as untrustworthy for suppressing evidence
Media is framed as exploiting personal trauma for entertainment
Media coverage is implicitly framed as complicit in exploitation
Media is portrayed as untrustworthy and biased in its editing
Under-13 users are framed as vulnerable and at risk due to platform design
Media and public commentary are framed as intrusive and morally judgmental
Media and public commentary portrayed as intrusive and untrustworthy in personal matters
Framing the story as a dramatic, unusual event